Enough is Enough!
Enough murder? We have established laws against that now. That doesn’t appear to stop people from killing others. Granted the death penalty is retributive and not preventative in nature, and that’s a wholly different debate. So then what is needed, a ban on all guns? Those are protected by the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution and I don’t think that is going away anytime soon. Any law enacted to ban guns will only affect the law abiding. To paraphrase Cesare Beccaria, banning guns would encourage rather than prevent murder, as it requires less courage to attack an unarmed person than an armed person.
Enough murder? We have established laws against that now. That doesn’t appear to stop people from killing others. Granted the death penalty is retributive and not preventative in nature, and that’s a wholly different debate. So then what is needed, a ban on all guns? Those are protected by the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution and I don’t think that is going away anytime soon. Any law enacted to ban guns will only affect the law abiding. To paraphrase Cesare Beccaria, banning guns would encourage rather than prevent murder, as it requires less courage to attack an unarmed person than an armed person.
Then perhaps we need “smarter gun laws”? The laws are smart
now. You can’t be a felon, illegal alien, have warrants, restraining orders, or
have a misdemeanor conviction of domestic violence. You can’t use or abuse any
controlled substances, have been dishonorably discharged from the armed forces,
or renounced US citizenship. You must be 18 to purchase a rifle or shotgun, 21
for handguns. The argument advances to more gun laws then? More laws against
your rights, laws that a criminal will ignore? “Smarter laws” against how a
weapon, specifically rifles, look?
Maybe I could accept bi-annual background checks, but that
would burden a system that is already under strain. But hey, more federal jobs!
Maybe I could accept raising the purchase age to 21 for rifles and shotguns,
but then I’d argue we’d have to do the same for other dangerous things, such as driver’s licenses, voting, filing
a lawsuit, military service, getting a tattoo, buying a vehicle, and standing
jury duty.
I don’t have the answer, but I have ideas.
Mass shootings, whether at a school, church, or outdoor
venue have things in common beyond the weapons used. I hope we can agree that a
person that wants to take innocent (or anonymous at least) lives of others have
an emotional if not mental issue. So let’s increase mental health screenings
for students and medical patients that may have experienced a sea-change event
in their lives. A parent, spouse or sibling passing, the loss of a job, or divorce.
These can be real triggers to certain people. Flag these events in the federal
background check system, enact a 3-month purchasing ban for weapons.
Secondly, I think an architectural solution is in order. Any
school that gets federal funding should have controlled access points onto secured
school property. Bye-bye open campuses. At
those access points should be metal detectors or wands. Let’s also ensure that
backpacks are limited in size and see-through, much like the requirement at
professional stadiums.
Lastly, get rid of the “gun-free zones” since they are not
working. I’m not sure I want Mrs. Higgins the history teacher or Mr. Hayes in chemistry
trying to take down a shooter. There’s too many bystanders in the way which
could result in more injured. But there should be well trained and armed
persons available always. I could imagine there would be plenty of military
veterans that would be more than willing to volunteer their time to roam school
property looking for the bad guys. Make them go through a course certified by
local law enforcement, give them extra vetting. I’m sure there would be plenty
of applicants.